The two products at a glance
| Product | Who it fits | Who should skip it | Published entry price | Free plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homebase Payroll | Main Street employers comparing payroll with scheduling, time clocks, and hourly team operations. | Your workforce is primarily salaried and your requirements center on a broad midmarket HCM suite. | $49/month + $6 per active employeeHomebase Payroll planVendor pricing page, checked Oct 27, 2026 ↗ | No |
| Gusto | Small employers that want payroll, employee records, and benefits workflows evaluated together. | Your evaluation requires an enterprise operating model with highly customized global payroll controls. | $49/month + $6 per personSimple planPlus $80 + $12 per person; Premium $180 + $22Vendor pricing page, checked Oct 27, 2026 ↗ | No |
Prices are the entry list prices each vendor publishes on its own US pricing page, read on Oct 27, 2026. They exclude taxes, payment processing unless stated, hardware, add-ons and negotiated discounts; a promotion appears only in the notes, labeled as one. Prices change. No vendor paid for a place or a price in this table.
The two products start in different places. Homebase Payroll is positioned for Main Street employers that want payroll alongside scheduling, time clocks and hourly team operations; payroll is the step that follows the shift. Gusto is positioned for small employers that want payroll, employee records and benefits evaluated together; payroll is the step that follows the hire. Which starting point matches your business decides the pair.
Verdict: Gusto, unless the schedule runs the business
For the general small employer, including one with some hourly staff, choose Gusto. Its scope covers what grows with a team over time, the record and the benefits as well as the pay run, and that matters more across a few years than any single workflow.
Choose Homebase Payroll if most of your people are hourly, shifts change every week, and the team already lives in Homebase for scheduling and clocking in. For that business, payroll attached to the time data it already captures is the shorter path.
Where Homebase Payroll wins
The shift-to-paycheck chain. In a restaurant, shop or service business, the hard part of payroll, in our view, is not the calculation but the hours feeding it. A product positioned around scheduling, time clocks and payroll together aims to keep that chain in one place. In a trial, have a manager edit a shift and approve the hours, then check that the owner's pay run shows the same figures without re-entry.
Hourly operations as the center. Homebase is positioned for teams where the weekly schedule is the main management tool. If that describes your week, a payroll organized around it will feel natural.
Where we would not start at Homebase is the inverse case: a mostly salaried workforce, or requirements that point to a broad midmarket HCM suite.
Where Gusto wins
Breadth that small teams grow into. Benefits and employee records become more important as a business adds people. A product whose published focus covers both avoids bolting them on later.
A better fit for mixed teams. An office with a few salaried staff and a few hourly ones gets less from schedule-centered payroll and more from a people-centered one.
Records you keep either way
Under the FLSA, covered employers must preserve certain records of hours worked and wages paid, and the DOL's recordkeeping page lists them. A time clock wired into payroll helps produce those records, but it does not prove they are accurate. Whichever product you choose, decide who approves hours before each run and keep that approval.
The deciding test
Open last month's calendar. If most of the work was managing who works which shift, choose Homebase Payroll. If most of it was hiring, onboarding and answering employee questions, choose Gusto.
Traceable evidence
Sources for this decision
- vendorHomebase Payroll official product siteHomebase Payroll · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Vendor-published product scope used to verify capabilities relevant to this buyer context: Main Street employers comparing payroll with scheduling, time clocks, and hourly team operations.. It does not prove the guide's fit verdict, configured performance, current pricing or compliance.Open source ↗
- vendorGusto official product siteGusto · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Vendor-published product scope used to verify capabilities relevant to this buyer context: Small employers that want payroll, employee records, and benefits workflows evaluated together.. It does not prove the guide's fit verdict, configured performance, current pricing or compliance.Open source ↗
- regulatorFLSA Recordkeeping and ReportingU.S. Department of Labor · checked Aug 5, 2026 · supports: Federal records that covered employers must preserve under the FLSA and their retention context; it does not prove a timekeeping or payroll configuration is accurate.Open source ↗